4 - TRAMONTE IMPLANT IN ADVANCED AGE

In summary, but we'll talk about it later, the Tramonte plants:
A- Reset pre-prosthetic surgery.
B- allow the preservation of the cortical roof when present,

C- they can also be inserted into thin ridges, thus allowing the conservation of the roof,
D- make the detachment useless,
E- reduce bone consumption to almost zero, for perforation and insertion, F- favour the formation of the gingival collar even in the presence of free gum,

G- inhibit peri-implant reabsorbtion because the cortex remains around the neck
H- hinder peri-implantitis,
I - they do not have internal collection and bacterial re-diffusion tanks,

L- being a monoblock they are less subject to fracture or distortion of the constituent parts,
M- they are practically indifferent to any bacterial plaque or food residues, N- offer a fast and effective insertion technique

O- the surgical maneuvers are so little invasive and so gentle as to make Tramonte implants indicated in old age, in smokers, in chronic diseases

P- Healing is fast
Q- normal chewing activity is immediately restored,
R- complications are practically absent. But there are other advantages ..... T- use of antibiotics and anti-inflammatories reduced to a minimum,
U- zero cortisone, swelling minimized or absent,
V- only punctate anesthesia, minimal,
Z- patient's return to work even on the same day,
Y- minimal or no post-surgery gem,
X- there is no bone atrophy following dissection,
W- bone grafting is almost never necessary.
- minimum intervention times.
- fast preparation times, impression, and relations with the laboratory - low purchase costs of the implant products, and therefore,
- the possibility of having a complete spare system warehouse from which to choose the appropriate system at the time of the intervention.
- very high implant success rates
- very low risk of damage to noble structures (arteries, veins, nerves)
thanks to the type of burs and insertion
-thirty-year-old personal case studies of my team
- implant technique finally accepted by universities, hospitals and legal medicine, which previously fiercely opposed it.